MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3011285294 · doi:10.1101/2020.03.10.986562

Rational design of novel fluorescent enzyme biosensors for direct detection of strigolactones

2020· preprint· en· W3011285294 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Rebecca J. Chesterfield, Jason Whitfield, Benjamin Pouvreau, Da Cao, Christine A. Beveridge, Claudia E. Vickers

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2020
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Parasitism and Resistance
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanada Excellence Research Chairs, Government of CanadaUniversity of QueenslandCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research OrganisationAustralian Government
KeywordsStrigolactoneBiosensorRhizosphereBiologyGreen fluorescent proteinStrigaFluorescenceOrobancheBiochemistryChemistryCell biologyBotanyArabidopsisBacteriaGeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Strigolactones are plant hormones and rhizosphere signalling molecules with key roles in plant development, mycorrhizal fungal symbioses, and plant parasitism. Currently, sensitive, specific, and high-throughput methods of detecting strigolactones are limited. Here, we developed genetically encoded fluorescent strigolactone biosensors based on the strigolactone receptors DAD2 from Petunia hybrida, and HTL7 from Striga hermonthica via domain insertion of circularly permuted GFP. The DAD2 biosensor exhibited loss of cpGFP fluorescence in vitro upon treatment with the strigolactones 5-deoxystrigol and orobanchol, or the strigolactone analogue GR24. The biosensor likewise responded to strigolactones in an in vivo protoplast system, and retained strigolactone hydrolysis activity. The ShHTL7 biosensor exhibited loss of cpGFP fluorescence upon GR24 treatment in vitro, and responded to a specific inhibitor of ShHTL7 but not DAD2, indicating that the biosensors retained the specificity of their parent receptors. These biosensors have applications in high-throughput screening, and may also have utility for studying strigolactone biology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.078
Threshold uncertainty score0.587

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicPlant Parasitism and ResistanceFrench-language works237,207