Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 22/PUU-XV/2017 Tentang Batas Usia Nikah Bagi Perempuan
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Hukum positif Indonesia membedakan batasan minimal umur nikah antara laki-laki dan perempuan, perbedaan ini dinilai menimbulkan polemik. Olehnya, Undang-Undang No. 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan digugat dan diuji di depan sidang Mahkamah Konstitusi. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui landasan Pemohon mengajukan judicial review dan Pertimbangan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Putusan Nomor 22/PUU-XV/2017. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kepustakaan (library research) dengan menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menyimpulkan bahwa alasan para Pemohon adalah karena terlanggarnya hak anak yang meliputi kesehatan, pendidikan, eksploitasi anak dan perbedaan usia nikah di negara lain. MK mengabulkannya permohonan para Pemohon karena Pasal 7 ayat (1) telah menimbulkan diskriminasi atas dasar jenis kelamin yang berdampak pada tidak terpenuhinya hak anak perempuan sebagai bagian dari hak asasi manusia yang telah di jamin dalam Undang-Undang Dasar 1974.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it