An automated predictor for identifying transition states in solids
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The minimum energy path (MEP) and transition state are two key parameters in the investigation of the mechanisms of chemical reactions and structural phase transformations. However, determination of transition paths in solids is challenging. Here, we present an evolutionary method to search for the lowest energy path and the transition state for pressure-induced structural transformations in solids without any user input or prior knowledge of possible paths. Instead, the initial paths are chosen stochastically by connecting randomly selected atoms from the initial to final structure. The MEP of these trials paths were computed and ranked in order of their energies. The matrix particle swarm optimization algorithm is then used to generate improved transition paths. The procedure is repeated until the lowest energy MEP is found. This method is validated by reproducing results of several known systems. The new method also successfully located the MEP for the direct low-temperature pressure induced transformation of face centered-cubic (FCC) silicon to the simple hexagonal(sh) phase and FCC lithium to a complex body centered-cubic cI16 high-pressure phase. The proposed method provides a convenient, robust, and reliable approach to identify the MEP of phase transformations. The method is general and applicable to a variety of problems requiring the location of the transition state.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".