MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3011430297 · doi:10.7202/1067287ar

Les morts littéraires de Jean de Brébeuf : l’histoire coloniale et l’imaginaire canadien

2019· article· fr· W3011430297 on OpenAlex
Paul D. Morris

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueEurostudia · 2019
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Saint-Boniface
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtFrench

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La vie et surtout la mort du missionnaire jésuite Jean de Brébeuf en Huronie au XVII e siècle occupent une place complexe et évolutive dans l’imaginaire canadien. Un personnage clé au moment du contact initial entre les colonisateurs européens et les peuples indigènes de l’Amérique du Nord, Brébeuf fut destiné à devenir encore plus grand que le rôle historique qu’il a joué dans sa vie. Avec sa mort, Brébeuf entra dans le domaine des représentations mythiques du Canada. L’article actuel cherche à tracer la trajectoire historique de la place de Brébeuf dans les littératures d’expression anglophone et francophone au Canada. Faisant référence à une lecture de trois textes littéraires représentatifs, l’article suggère que la représentation littéraire de Brébeuf peut être étroitement alignée sur des conceptions historiquement changeantes du Canada selon des compréhensions francophone, anglophone et autochtone de l’identité nationale.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.152
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it