MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Conrad Hal Waddington (1905–1975)

2020· other· en· W3011449435 on OpenAlexaff
Brian K. Hall

Bibliographic record

VenueEncyclopedia of Life Sciences · 2020
Typeother
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMitochondrial Function and Pathology
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsModern evolutionary synthesisBiologyEpigeneticsEvolutionary biologyEvolutionary developmental biologyCognitive scienceEnvironmental ethicsEcologyGeneticsPhilosophyPsychologyGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Conrad Hal Waddington (1905–1975) took a degree in Geology at Sidney Sussex College, Cambridge. He began but never finished a graduate degree; genetics and experimental embryology replaced palaeontology. He began experimental studies on the chemical nature of the primary organiser discovered by Spemann and Mangold in 1924. From collaboration with Joseph and Dorothy Needham and through the Theoretical Biology Club, came the concepts of evocation and individuation. Establishment of a Unit on Animal Breeding and Genetics in Edinburgh after the second World War provided Waddington with his professional home where he sought to integrate genetics and development into an evolutionarily relevant discipline. Adhering to the organic philosophy initiated by Alfred Whitehead (organicism) Waddington identified three major modes of explanation for the development of organisms as integrated wholes: canalisation, genetic assimilation and epigenetics. The metaphorical epigenetic landscape became the way most developmental biologists ‘saw’ the organisation of embryonic development. Integrated, heritable, epigenetic organisation of embryonic development is Waddington's lasting legacy to development and evolution. Key Concepts Canalisation is a homeostatic mechanism by which development is buffered against environmental or genetic variation, allowing the same feature to form under changing conditions. Genetic assimilation is the process by which embryos respond to changes in the environment by producing a different phenotype, which, through selection, can arise in the absence of the environmental change. Epigenetics (Waddingtonian epigenetics) is the term for the interactions among genes and between genes and environmental signals that result in the formation of elements of the phenotype. Molecular epigenetics is the study of how mechanisms such as methylation or imprinting regulate gene action. Interactions between parts of developing animal embryos (embryonic induction) are essential for the development of major body parts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.071
Threshold uncertainty score0.238

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0710.030

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEncyclopedia of Life SciencesSame topicMitochondrial Function and PathologyFrench-language works237,207