MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3011453679 · doi:10.36106/gjra/9107028

DICHOTOMY IN ATWOOD'S WORKS

2020· article· en· W3011453679 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
N.K. Jha

Bibliographic record

VenueGLOBAL JOURNAL FOR RESEARCH ANALYSIS · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicShort Stories in Global Literature
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAmbivalenceMythologyPoliticsFeelingPower (physics)PsychoanalysisSociologyAestheticsHistoryGender studiesLiteraturePolitical scienceArtPsychologySocial psychologyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Atwood uses Blake's contrasting mythological imagery and metaphorical language in “Double Persephone”. She unveils the schizoid or double nature of Canada for man and woman in the society. She observes that Canadians came to develop ambivalent feelings toward their country. She later on nds dichotomy in Power Politics. She explores the relationship between sexual roles and power structures on exploration of personal relationships and international politics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.047

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0130.029
Scholarly communication0.0090.007
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0030.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.122
GPT teacher head0.415
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGLOBAL JOURNAL FOR RESEARCH ANALYSISSame topicShort Stories in Global LiteratureFrench-language works237,207