Metamorphic evolution of high-pressure felsic and pelitic granulites from the Qianlishan Complex and tectonic implications for the Khondalite Belt, North China Craton
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract High-pressure felsic granulites in association with pelitic granulites are widely distributed in the Qianlishan Complex of the Khondalite Belt, North China Craton. A link between “inter-layered” felsic and pelitic granulites was established based on comprehensive metamorphic analysis, revealing that they record similar metamorphic stages: peak pressure (M1), post-peak decompression (M2), and late retrograde cooling (M3) stages. Felsic granulites experienced high-pressure metamorphism up to ∼12 kbar, while pelitic granulites estimated peak pressure is 11–15 kbar. The decompression stage (M2) is indicated by cordierite + sillimanite symplectite and/or cordierite coronae with conditions of 5.7–6.5 kbar/800–835 °C in pelitic granulites, and by garnet-sillimanite assemblages with conditions of >6.5 kbar/810–865 °C in felsic granulites. The later cooling stage (M3) is marked by sub-solidus biotite-quartz-plagioclase symplectite and later melt crystallization. These mineral assemblages and pressure-temperature (P-T) conditions define clockwise P-T paths involving near-isothermal decompression and near-isobaric cooling, suggesting a continent-continent collisional event. Secondary ion mass spectrometry zircon U-Pb dating yields a consistent metamorphic age of ca. 1.95 Ga, interpreted as peak metamorphism. The results, combined with available data, suggest that the Khondalite Belt formed by collision between the Yinshan and Ordos blocks at ca. 1.95 Ga.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".