Repenser les sources de l’histoire environnementale grâce aux outils numériques : le cas de la vallée de l’Escaut (France)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Face à la multiplication des données historiques, le recours aux outils numériques est devenu indispensable aux historiens et professionnels du patrimoine. Ces supports technologiques donnent une nouvelle lecture aux sources pour visualiser, clarifier et diffuser l’information historique. À travers l’exemple de la vallée de l’Escaut (Hauts-de-France), il s’agit ici de présenter ces outils numériques permettant de revisiter l’étude des sources historiques dans une perspective d’histoire environnementale, en adoptant une démarche à la fois scientifique, pédagogique et de valorisation. L’enjeu est de montrer l’apport de ces supports méthodologiques pour reconstituer les évolutions historiques des espaces fluviaux du Moyen Âge à l’époque contemporaine afin d’éclairer les acteurs actuels du territoire.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it