Kozai mechanism inside mean motion resonances in the three-dimensional phase space
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT In this paper, we investigate the Kozai mechanism inside the inclined mean motion resonance (MMR) through a three-dimensional (3D) phase space. The Hamiltonian approximation for both prograde and retrograde MMRs is established by a semi-analytical method. We pick Jupiter as the disturber and study the Kozai mechanism in the Sun–Jupiter circular restricted three-body problem. Kozai islands of the prograde and retrograde MMRs are found in the 3D phase space. Numerical integration demonstrates that the locus of the orbit on the Kozai island is bounded by the Kozai island in the 3D phase space, so the orbit is locked in the Kozai+MMR state. The study of the Kozai dynamics inside a retrograde 1:1 MMR indicates that Kozai islands in the 3D phase space are just a sufficient condition for the Kozai+MMR mechanism rather than a necessary condition. There is no Kozai island in the 3D space for the retrograde 1:1 MMR, but the resonant coupling of Kozai with the retrograde 1:1 MMR appears in the phase space. Finally, dynamical behaviours of the two test particles located on Kozai islands are demonstrated in the ephemeris model.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".