MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3011523529 · doi:10.1190/geo2019-0282.1

Missing well log prediction using convolutional long short-term memory network

2020· article· en· W3011523529 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysics · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSeismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyContinental shelfWell loggingInterval (graph theory)Field (mathematics)Submarine pipelineConvolutional neural networkMonte Carlo methodData setData miningComputer scienceStatisticsArtificial intelligenceGeophysicsGeotechnical engineeringOceanographyMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Reservoir characterization involves integration of different types of data to understand the subsurface rock properties. To incorporate multiple well log types into reservoir studies, estimating missing logs is an essential step. We have developed a method to estimate missing well logs by using a bidirectional convolutional long short-term memory (bidirectional ConvLSTM) cascaded with fully connected neural networks. We train the model on 177 wells from mature areas of the UK continental shelf (UKCS). We test the trained model on one blind well from UKCS, three wells from the Volve field in the Norwegian continental shelf, one well from the Penobscot field in the Scotian shelf offshore Canada, and one well from the Teapot Dome data set in Wyoming. The method takes into account the depth trend and the local shape of logs by using ConvLSTM architecture. The method is examined on sonic log prediction and can produce an accurate prediction of sonic logs from gamma-ray, density, and neutron porosity logs. The advantages of our method are that it is not applied on an interval by interval basis like rock-physics-based methods and it also outputs the uncertainties facilitated by dropout layers and Monte Carlo sampling at inference time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.827
Threshold uncertainty score0.595

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it