MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3011529090 · doi:10.1109/tap.2020.2998913

A Multiplicative Regularizer Augmented With Spatial Priors for Microwave Imaging

2020· article· en· W3011529090 on OpenAlexafffund
Nozhan Bayat, Puyan Mojabi

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrowave Imaging and Scattering Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsMultiplicative functionPrior probabilityMicrowave imagingRegularization (linguistics)Computer scienceTerm (time)AlgorithmNorm (philosophy)Iterative reconstructionPrior informationMathematical optimizationMathematicsApplied mathematicsArtificial intelligenceMicrowaveBayesian probabilityMathematical analysisPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The standard weighted L2norm total variation multiplicative regularization (MR) term originally developed for microwave imaging (MWI) algorithms is modified to take into account structural prior information, also known as spatial priors (SPs), about the object being imaged. This modification adds one extra term to the integrand of the standard MR, thus being referred to as an augmented MR (AMR). The main advantage of the proposed approach is that it requires a minimal change to the existing MWI algorithms that are already equipped with the MR. Using two experimental data sets, it is shown that the proposed AMR 1) can handle partial (incomplete) SP and 2) can, to some extent, enhance the quantitative accuracy achievable from MWI.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Antennas and PropagationSame topicMicrowave Imaging and Scattering AnalysisFrench-language works237,207