Balancing herding and congestion in service systems: a queueing perspective
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In service industries such as restaurants and tourism, empirical findings show that uninformed customers may consider queues as a signal of service quality and choose to join a longer queue. Service managers become aware of this phenomenon and stimulate customer purchase by maintaining a queue. In this paper, we explore issues related to the balance between herding and congestion for service systems using a state-dependent queue. In our model, the herding effect is represented by system idle probability (as opposed to system busy probability) and the congestion is represented by a non-decreasing function of queue length. An optimization problem with the objective of minimizing the long-run average cost and constraints on traffic intensities is formulated, and the structure of its optimal solution is characterized. Further, we find closed-form solutions of the optimal state-dependent traffic intensity and the optimal service rate switching state, and characterize the relationship between the optimal solution and system parameters. Through a series of propositions and numerical examples, we gain insight into the balance between stimulation of herding effect and reduction of customer waiting, and propose that service managers should intentionally slow down when the queue is short and operate at their full speed when the queue is long.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".