MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Le Prix Goncourt et la Grande-Bretagne : critiques, traductions et consécration

2005· book-chapter· fr· W3011575056 on OpenAlexaff
Katherine Ashley

Bibliographic record

VenuePresses universitaires du Septentrion eBooks · 2005
Typebook-chapter
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicFrench Literature and Poetry
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Lethbridge
Fundersnot available
KeywordsconsArtComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Une lettre de Paul Margueritte rédigée en 1909 et publiée dans le Times Literary Supplement (T.L.S.), hebdomadaire intellectuel équivalent du Monde des lettres, atteste que non seulement les Britanniques étaient au courant de ce qui se passait en France, mais que l’Académie Goncourt suivait de près les débats littéraires outre-manche. Effectivement, quand Edmond de Goncourt a rédigé son testament, et quand la Société littéraire des Goncourt a décerné son premier prix en 1903, le français éta...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.092
Threshold uncertainty score0.184

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0070.020
Scholarly communication0.0070.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePresses universitaires du Septentrion eBooksSame topicFrench Literature and PoetryFrench-language works237,207