MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3011575449 · doi:10.1144/pygs2019-015

A rare and unusual trace fossil from the Lower Jurassic (Lias Group) of Ketton, East Midlands, UK

2020· article· en· W3011575449 on OpenAlexaff
Stephen K. Donovan, Peter del Strother, Timothy A.M. Ewin

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Yorkshire Geological Society · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological formations and processes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGroup (periodic table)Trace fossilTRACE (psycholinguistics)PaleontologyGeologyGeochemistryChemistryPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The top of the Whitby Mudstone Formation (Lias Group, Toarcian, Bifrons ammonite Zone) is exposed low in the geological Site of Special Scientific Interest at Ketton Quarry, East Midlands. A rare burrow of Fustiglyphus annulatus Vialov from this part of the succession, not reported from the Whitby Mudstone Formation hitherto, was collected from float. In the dull brown mudrock, the burrow has a contrasting fill of grey sandstone. The shaft of the burrow is cylindrical, with two broad, bell-shaped chambers. Fustiglyphus annulatus is found in deeper water deposits in the post-Palaeozoic, so its occurrence in the Whitby Mudstone Formation, an offshore shelf deposit, is not unexpected. However, orientation is equivocal; the burrow was either angled at 45° to bedding, based on the evidence of an associated Arenicolites isp., or parallel to bedding, its common configuration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.040
Threshold uncertainty score0.079

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the Yorkshire Geological SocietySame topicGeological formations and processesFrench-language works237,207