MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Alcohol Use and Rural Youth

2018· article· en· W3011577381 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Jean Thompson

Bibliographic record

VenueRural Review Ontario Rural Planning Development and Policy · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)PsychologyAlcohol abusePopulationEnvironmental healthAlcoholRural areaQualitative researchHuman factors and ergonomicsPoison controlSocial psychologySuicide preventionDevelopmental psychologyMedicinePsychiatryGeographySociologySocial science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ontario’s rural youth drink more frequently and in greater quantities than their urban counterparts (Boak et al., 2015). While this puts them at greater risk of sexual violence, injury, academic disruptions, and the harms associated with drinking and driving as a result of alcohol use than their counterparts, it also increases the population’s likelihood of experiencing alcohol related use or abuse issues later in life as research has demonstrated that the age of first use of alcohol has such implications (Chou & Pickering, 1992; Skidmore et al., 2011). Considering the risks associated with excessive alcohol use, determining the motivations and context for the choice to use alcohol to intoxication is very important. This presentation intends to discuss the literature related to rural youth and alcohol use, the available data, and the researcher’s plans to address the need for qualitative research on the subject.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.046
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.070
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRural Review Ontario Rural Planning Development and PolicySame topicSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesFrench-language works237,207