MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

An Automatic State Detection Algorithm for Non-intrusive Load Monitoring

2019· article· en· W3011631033 on OpenAlexaff
Shitikantha Dash, Kandarp Gandhi, Ranjana Sodhi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSmart Grid Energy Management
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceMATLABState (computer science)Real-time computingKnowledge baseEnergy consumptionBase (topology)Scale (ratio)Energy (signal processing)Data miningAlgorithmArtificial intelligenceEngineeringOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Knowing the power consumption of individual household appliances is useful for end-user as well as utilities. There are two ways for appliance load monitoring (ALM), namely intrusive load monitoring (ILM) and non-intrusive load monitoring (NILM). This paper focuses on the NILM approach, and discusses a simple yet effective method to improve its accuracy by constructing a better knowledge-base. The proposed methodology is initially verified with the simulation using the Reference Energy Disaggregation Data (REDD) dataset, and later tested on a lab-scale hardware setup as well. Test results reveal that careful construction of knowledge-base can increase the performance of NILM algorithms. MATLAB is used as the programming platform.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.535
Threshold uncertainty score0.497

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSmart Grid Energy ManagementFrench-language works237,207