MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3011685525 · doi:10.1111/jgs.16406

Interplay between Socioeconomic Markers and Polygenic Predisposition on Timing of Dementia Diagnosis

2020· article· en· W3011685525 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Olesya Ajnakina, Dorina Cadar, Andrew Steptoe

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteNational Institute on AgingMedical Research CouncilNational Institutes of HealthCentre hospitalier régional universitaire de LilleInstitute Pasteur De LilleHjartaverndErasmus Medisch CentrumNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchBundesministerium für Bildung und ForschungMedical Research Council CanadaGovernment of the United KingdomInstitut National de la Santé et de la Recherche MédicaleWellcome TrustAgence Nationale de la RechercheDevelopment of Innovative Strategies for a Transdisciplinary approach to ALZheimer's diseaseEconomic and Social Research CouncilUniversité de Lille
KeywordsMedicineSocioeconomic statusDementiaGerontologyGenetic predispositionPolygenic risk scoreGeneticsEnvironmental healthInternal medicineDiseaseGenotypePopulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVES: Identifying the interplay between socioeconomic markers (education and financial resources) and polygenetic predisposition influencing the time of dementia and the diagnosis of clinical Alzheimer's disease (AD) dementia is of central relevance for preventive strategies. DESIGN: Prospective cohort design. SETTING: The English Longitudinal Study of Aging is a household survey data set of a representative sample. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 7,039 individuals aged 50 years and older participated in the study. Of these, 320 (4.6%) were diagnosed with dementia over the 10-year follow-up. MEASUREMENTS: Polygenic score (PGS) for Alzheimer's disease (AD-PGS) was calculated using summary statistics from the International Genomics of Alzheimer's Project. An accelerated failure time survival model was used to investigate interactions between AD-PGS and socioeconomic markers on the timing of dementia and clinical AD dementia diagnosis. RESULTS: A one standard deviation increase in AD-PGS was associated with an accelerated time to dementia diagnosis by 4.8 months. The presence of the apolipoprotein E gene (APOE-ε4) was associated with an earlier dementia onset by approximately 24.9 months, whereas intermediate and low levels of wealth were associated with an accelerated time to dementia diagnosis by 12.0 months and 18.7 months, respectively. A multiplicative interaction between AD-PGS and years of completed schooling in decelerating the time to clinical AD dementia by 3.0 months suggests educational attainment may serve as a protective mechanism against AD diagnosis among older people with a higher polygenic risk. Interaction between AD-PGS and lower wealth accelerated the time to clinical AD dementia diagnosis by 21.1 to 24.1 months. CONCLUSION: Socioeconomic markers influence the time to dementia and clinical AD dementia diagnosis, particularly in those with a higher polygenic predisposition. J Am Geriatr Soc 68:1529-1536, 2020.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations34
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Geriatrics SocietySame topicDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchFrench-language works237,207