Machines et outils de l’industrie aéronautique. Un patrimoine menacé, à Toulouse comme à Seattle
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article présente les menaces qui pèsent sur la conservation des outils et des machines de l’industrie aéronautique. En effet, cette activité récente et florissante n’a pas encore pris pleinement conscience de sa dimension historique et patrimoniale. Ses acteurs agissent parfois en ordre dispersé pour sauver ce qui peut l’être. Dans cet univers qui a le culte du secret, l’historien universitaire n’est pas toujours le bienvenu, à Toulouse comme à Seattle. Heureusement, il existe des associations dynamiques qui multiplient les initiatives afin d’éviter des pertes irréparables. Mais pour les périodes les plus anciennes, beaucoup de documents et d’objets manquent déjà à l’appel.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it