MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3011756031 · doi:10.23977/acss.2020.040101

Fault diagnosis of wind turbine based on H-SKDB model

2020· article· en· W3011756031 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Baoyi Wang, Dongbing Yuan, Shaomin Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in Computer Signals and Systems · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Computational Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTurbineWind powerFault (geology)Bayesian networkFault modelReliability engineeringEngineeringComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The wind farm is in a bad wind area, which causes wind turbine faults to occur. Fault diagnosis of wind turbines is helpful for the maintenance and operation of wind turbines. The SKDB (Extensible Bayesian Network) model has the characteristics of high fault diagnosis accuracy and short training time. Based on the SKDB model, the Bayesian network structure is constructed by the method of mutual information addition calculation, then a fault diagnosis model of wind turbine based on H-SKDB is proposed, which realizes the fault diagnosis of wind turbine equipment information status. The experimental results show that the fault diagnosis method has higher calculation accuracy and shorter calculation time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.837
Threshold uncertainty score0.548

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvances in Computer Signals and SystemsSame topicAdvanced Computational Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207