MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3011757782 · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2980134

An Integrated Multiscale Geometric Analysis Approach for Automatic Extraction of Power Lines From High Resolution Remote Sensing Images

2020· article· en· W3011757782 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Muleta Ebissa Feyissa, Jiannong Cao, Junjun Li

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Access · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAutomated Road and Building Extraction
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaMinistry of Natural Resources
KeywordsComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceThresholdingComputer visionBrightnessGround truthNoise (video)Image resolutionPower (physics)Orientation (vector space)Pattern recognition (psychology)Image (mathematics)MathematicsPhysicsOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

High resolution remote sensing systems provide cheaper and fast way of acquiring images of power lines. However, such images depicting the details of other complex background objects, noises, and complicated brightness measurements, make separate extraction of the power lines challenging. This paper addresses the problem of automatic extraction of power lines from high resolution remote sensing images obtained from different sources. In order to automatically extract the power lines, we proposed an integrated Multiscale Geometric Analysis (MGA) approach. First, complementary Gabor and matched filters (MF) were employed over an image to suppress unnecessary background and noises, and initial discrimination of the power lines. Then, the filtering output was decomposed in to scale and orientation based subband coefficients using the Fast Discrete Curvelet Transform (FDCT) so as to access and modify different image features separately. By employing selective modification operations, well-established power line structures ready for extraction were derived. Finally the powerlines were extracted with hysteresis thresholding. The approach was successful in extracting power lines from high resolution images captured in any orientation. It is robust even when the source image is cluttered, and degraded due to noise and brightness effects. Power lines represented by weak intensities, crossing bright image regions, changing direction, closer power lines and those crossing each other, disconnected/broken power lines due to noise and occlusions were all inferred and extracted successfully. The approach was validated using real test images and the performance measures showed over 90% average accuracy fitting the ground truth.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE AccessSame topicAutomated Road and Building ExtractionFrench-language works237,207