Prouesses du regard : le geste du regard entre photographie, pratique physique et performance
Bibliographic record
Abstract
À partir de la séquence du match de tennis mimé qui clôt le filmBlow-Upde Michelangelo Antonioni (1966), l’article aborde la question du geste du regard, au croisement des pratiques sportives, du mime corporel et de la photographie. La réorganisation globale de l’expérience du regard induite par le dispositif photographique au début de la modernité instille également une tension et une séparation entre regard corporel et regard mécanique, une fracture parfois douloureuse que s’approprie le théâtre. Les quelques exemples analysés, notamment la sérieLe sportd’Étienne Decroux, la chorégraphiePressde Pierre Rigal et la performanceMetáforade Manuel Vason, montrent différentes solutions possibles à cette fracture, mais témoignent également d’une aspiration commune vers une forme possible de regard renforcé, puissant, qui pourrait naître de la synthèse de ces deux regards.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.024 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".