La construction sociohistorique d’une identité de profession chez les conseillers d’orientation québécois sous la perspective des interactions entre l’ordre professionnel et les acteurs du milieu
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Since its inclusion in the Quebec professional system, how has the identity of the profession of guidance counsellors been shaped through its regulatory professional body? Based on an interactionist perspective of the sociology of professions (Dubar, 2000), this article examines the notion of “the identity of a profession” as a sociohistorical construct. An analysis of the content of the annual reports of the Ordre des conseillers et conseilleres d’orientationdu Quebec regulatory professional body of guidance/career counsellors in Quebec) from 1973 to 2012 identifies the types of interactions between the regulatory professional body and stakeholders in its political, economic, institutional, and other environments. The results suggest that the Ordre participates in three types of identity transactions based on the stakeholders involved: (a) partnership, interdependent, and knowledge transfer relationships; (b) cooperative activities on a case-by-case and ongoing monitoring basis to pursue common conditions for positioning, development, and socioprofessional outreach; and (c) positive promotion of the profession through service exchange.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.014 | 0.018 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".