MétaCan
← all works

Are Rubber Gloves Marketed as Accelerator-Free Truly Free of Accelerators? [RETRACTED]

2020· article· en· 3 citations· W3011809226 on OpenAlex· 10.1097/der.0000000000000508

Why is this work in the frame?

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

Canadian affiliationAn author listed a Canadian institution. This is the only route the usual frame has.
Canadian venueIt was published in a Canadian venue.

Post-publication record

Nature
Retraction
Reason
Error by Journal/Publisher;
Date
5/1/2020 0:00
Flagged by OpenAlex?
Yes

Source: Retraction Watch, joined by DOI. OpenAlex records retraction as is_retracted, a boolean over a state space with at least four values, so it cannot express an expression of concern, a correction or a reinstatement — it reports them as false, which reads as “fine”.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Allergic contact dermatitis to rubber accelerators in gloves has been well described in the literature. In response to this, glove manufacturers have recently marketed "accelerator-free" gloves. Little research has been done, to confirm whether these gloves are truly free from the accelerators known to cause contact dermatitis. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to verify use of accelerators in reportedly accelerator-free/low-dermatitis-potential gloves. METHODS: A total of 16 commercially available medical gloves touted as "accelerator-free," "sensitive," or "low dermatitis potential" were obtained and analyzed via mass spectrometry (liquid chromatography heated electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry and liquid chromatography heated electrospray high-resolution tandem mass spectrometry) to determine whether any of the 9 known rubber accelerators were present (thiurams, carbamates, mercaptobenzothiazole, and diphenylguanidine). RESULTS: Despite marketing claims to the contrary, all tested gloves had at least 1 accelerant detected. Dipentamethylenethiuram disulfide, a thiuram, was found in all 16 gloves. Half of the gloves (8/16) contained more than 1 accelerator, with 1 glove having 5 rubber accelerators present. CONCLUSION: Patients with allergic contact dermatitis to accelerators should be aware potentially sensitizing accelerators may be present in gloves that are reported to not contain them.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

The record

Venue
Dermatitis
Topic
Contact Dermatitis and Allergies
Field
Medicine
Canadian institutions
IONICS Mass Spectrometry (Canada)
Funders
Keywords
Accelerator mass spectrometryNatural rubberAllergic contact dermatitisMedicineMass spectrometryChromatographyChemistryOrganic chemistryAllergy
Has abstract in OpenAlex
yes