MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3011896947 · doi:10.5382/econgeo.4709

Gold Remobilization: Insights from Gold Deposits in the Archean Swayze Greenstone Belt, Abitibi Subprovince, Canada

2020· article· en· W3011896947 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueEconomic Geology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsLaurentian UniversityGeological Survey of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPyriteArcheanGreenstone beltGeochemistryGeologyElectron microprobeMineralogy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Recognizing if and how Au is remobilized, in solid, melt, or fluid state, is critical for understanding the origin of high-grade ore zones in Au deposits. When evidence for Au remobilization can be demonstrated, then primary versus secondary processes can be distinguished, resulting in a more complete understanding of Au deposit formation. To address this, samples from two Au deposits, Jerome and Kenty, in the Archean Swayze greenstone belt of northern Ontario, Canada, together with archived samples from 39 high-grade Au deposits from the Abitibi greenstone belt across Ontario and Quebec, were geochemically characterized using integrated scanning electron microscopy-energy dispersive spectroscopy and electron microprobe imaging and analyses in addition to laser ablation-inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry elemental mapping. These data provided the basis to develop a model for Au remobilization and upgrading of Au that is widely applicable to orogenic gold settings. Data for the Jerome deposit indicate that Au uptake into early pyrite was not due to pulsing of different fluids, but instead was predominantly controlled by S availability, whereby the oscillatory/sector zoning in pyrite resulted from the substitution of As into S sites during rapid growth due to local chemical disequilibrium. In addition, Au-bearing pyrite from both the Jerome and Kenty deposits records textures, such as porosity development coincident with the presence of native gold and accessory sulfide phases, that are strongly suggestive of coupled dissolution-reprecipitation (CDR) reactions that liberated Au and associated elements from earlier auriferous (100–5,000 ppm Au) pyrite. During the remobilization process, Au and Ag were decoupled, which resulted in (1) a change in Au/Ag ratios of 0.5 to 5 in early pyrite to ≈9 in the new native gold (900 Au fineness) and (2) incorporation of Ag into cogenetic secondary mineral phases (e.g., chalcopyrite, tetrahedrite, and galena). Evidence for an association of low-melting point chalcophile elements (LMCE; Hg, Te, Sb, and Bi) with Au at the Jerome, Kenty, and many (>50%) of the 39 historic deposits sampled, along with native gold filling structurally favorable sites in vein quartz in all samples, indicates a fluid might not have been the only factor contributing to remobilization. This systematic Au-LMCE association strongly supports a model whereby Au is released by CDR reactions and is then remobilized by fluid-mediated, LMCE-rich melts that began to form at 335°C and/or by local, nanoparticle (nanomelt?) transport during deformation and metamorphism. Conclusions drawn from this study have implications for Au deposits globally and can account for the common presence of coarse-grained, commonly crystalline, native gold filling fractures in quartz and the paragenetically late-stage origin of gold in veins. They can also better explain the inability of Au in solution remobilization models to account for locally high gold grades, given the relatively low solubility of Au in hydrothermal fluids.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.488
Threshold uncertainty score0.650

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.183
Teacher spread0.170 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it