MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3011907576

Pubic stress fracture presenting as a strain of adductor longus in a 16-year-old elite soccer player with Crohn's disease: a case report.

2019· article· en· W3011907576 on OpenAlexaff
Cameron Marshall, Robert Gringmuth

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSports injuries and prevention
Canadian institutionsCanadian Memorial Chiropractic College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineStress fracturesGroinDifferential diagnosisPhysical therapySurgery
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Adductor strains are the most commonly reported muscle injuries in adolescent soccer players and the second most common muscle injuries in adult players. Health practitioners should be aware of possible differential diagnoses, such as a pubic stress fracture or pubic apophysitis when athletes present with chronic groin pain. PURPOSE: To present a rare case of a unilateral pelvic stress fracture of a 16-year old elite soccer player with a history of Crohn's disease. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case report (n=1). METHODS: Case notes of two sports-based practitioners were reviewed and compiled retrospectively. RESULTS: Following activity restriction, a period of rest, conservative care, and progressive rehabilitation, this athlete was able to achieve a pain-free state with near equal iso-kinetic strength bilaterally as measured by Cybex 6000 (Cybex International Inc., Medway, MA, USA) muscle testing. Full activity was resumed 10 months after initial presentation and the athlete was able to return to playing professional soccer. SUMMARY: This case report presents a rare diagnosis of a unilateral pubic stress fracture presenting as a strain of adductor longus. Although quite rare, differential diagnoses such as a potential underlying stress fracture should be considered when presented with chronic or recurrent groin pain.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0050.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMedSame topicSports injuries and preventionFrench-language works237,207