MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3011912442

Las relaciones económicas de España y la política comercial de la Unión Europea

2020· article· es· W3011912442 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Cristina Serrano Lea

Bibliographic record

VenueEconomistas · 2020
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEmployment, Labor, and Gender Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceEuropean unionGeographyHumanitiesEconomyEconomicsInternational tradeArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La politica comercial de la Union Europea ha tenido una influencia decisiva en el desarrollo de las relaciones economicas internacionales de Espana. Estas relaciones abarcan tres areas prioritarias –la Union Europea, America, tanto del Norte como America Latina, y el Mediterraneo– asi como dos areas de futuro: Asia y Africa subsahariana. Los mas de cuarenta acuerdos preferenciales de libre comercio de la UE, junto con la politica comunitaria de inversiones, han facilitado los intercambios comerciales, la inversion directa espanola y el cambio de modelo a una economia internacionalizada. En estos momentos existen diversos retos para la politica comercial de la UE que tienen incidencia directa sobre el sector exterior espanol: el Brexit, la relacion comercial con EE.UU., la consecucion del acuerdo con Mercosur, la aplicacion de los acuerdos con Canada, Singapur, Vietnam y Japon, asi como el proceso de reforma de la OMC y la negociacion de nuevos acuerdos. Este articulo analizara la interrelacion entre las relaciones economicas y comerciales de Espana y la orientacion reciente de la politica comercial comunitaria.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.059
Threshold uncertainty score0.117

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.005
Science and technology studies0.0030.004
Scholarly communication0.0080.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEconomistasSame topicEmployment, Labor, and Gender StudiesFrench-language works237,207