MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3011973306

Histórias Horríveis do Serviço Social: cumplicidade e resistência

2019· article· pt· W3011973306 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Charles Toniolo Sousa

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial and Political Issues
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)PoliticsHumanitiesPolitical scienceSociologyPhilosophyHistoryArchaeology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

O presente texto e a traducao do original em ingles, “ Social Work’s horrible histories: collusion and resistance ”. Trata-se do Capitulo Quatro do livro “ Global Social Work in a political context: radical perspectives ”, publicado em 2018, pela Editora Policy Press, Universidade de Bristol. A partir de documentacao historica pesquisada em varios paises, o texto relata historias e praticas de assistentes sociais no seculo XX. durante regimes ditatoriais e/ou colonialistas existentes na Alemanha, Espanha, Grecia, Gra-Bretanha, Canada, Australia, Africa do Sul, pautadas por praticas autoritarias e com fortes influencias do eugenismo.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.096

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.007
Science and technology studies0.0120.045
Scholarly communication0.0180.011
Open science0.0010.008
Research integrity0.0040.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.359
Teacher spread0.308 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSocial and Political IssuesFrench-language works237,207