ЗОВНІШНЬОПОЛІТИЧНІ АСПЕКТИ ДІЯЛЬНОСТІ ЕМІГРАЦІЙНОГО УРЯДУ УНР В КРАЇНАХ ЄВРОПИ ТА ПІВНІЧНОЇ АМЕРИКИ (1924–1940 рр.)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The article describes the position and activity of the diplomatic service of the Exile Government of the Ukrainian National Republic in the countries of Europe and North America in 1924–1940. The scientific problem raised attracted the attention of representatives of the Ukrainian emigration and a number of modern Ukrainian researchers. However, the topic presented has not been adequately reflected in the national Historical science. The diplomatic service was an integral part of the foreign policy activity of the UNR emigration government and represented its interests among the world community. These are the reasons for the elimination of the Tarniv branch of the UNR. The role of S. Petliura in the intensification of diplomatic activity is illustrated. It is revealed that Warsaw and Paris were centers of implementation and coordination of the then foreign policy of the UNR. The attitude of foreign states to the Ukrainian issue is shown. The main milestones of foreign policy activity, work of diplomatic missions and ambassadors of the emigration government are analyzed. It is pointed out that the diplomatic activity was of a purely public nature, since after the signing of the Treaty of Riga in 1921, the UNR emigration government had no official representative offices in foreign countries. It was thanks to a cohort of UNR representatives who lived in different countries of the world that they were able to support work in the international arena (M. Eremiev, E. Onatsky, R. Smal-Stotskyi, O. Shulhyn, etc.). It is emphasized that active foreign policy activity was carried out not only in Western European countries but also in the region of Central and Eastern Europe. Foreign and social activity in the United States and Canada is covered. The authors conclude that the Warsaw-Paris period of UNR activity in exile is a testament to the continuity of the Ukrainian foreign policy service in the international arena, which has lost its official status due to the complex international situation and Bolshevik influences. The foreign policy of the exile government was closely intertwined with the socio-political, cultural and scientific vectors of the UNR government.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".