MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The impact of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and HER-2 receptor status on treatment of patients with advanced breast cancer.

2013· article· en· W3012012183 on OpenAlexaffabout
Paramjot Bains, Erin Powell

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdvanced Breast Cancer Therapies
Canadian institutionsDr. H. Bliss Murphy Cancer CentreMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineBreast cancerOncologyProgesterone receptorCancerMetastatic breast cancerInternal medicineBiopsyEstrogen receptorMetastasisGynecologyRetrospective cohort study

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

e11580 Background: There are many variables that affect treatment options and outcomes in advanced breast cancer. The expression of ER, PR and HER2 are key in determining prognosis and management. The traditional management of breast cancer did not involve biopsy of metastatic sites. Recent studies indicate that, in a significant number of patients, there is a change in receptor status in the metastasis, and this may alter treatment. There have been many retrospective studies looking at the change in the ER/PR status of the metastatic site. Change in treatment as a result has been less of a focus. Our objective is to document the likelihood of a change in receptor status and the impact of this on treatment. Methods: This is a single center retrospective chart review. Ethics approval has been obtained through Memorial Univeristy of Newfoundland. The Dr. H. Bliss Murphy Cancer Centre database was used to identify 250 patients in Newfoundland who were diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer between January 2006 and November 2011. The review includes patients diagnosed with de novo metastases and those who developed metastases following adjuvant treatment. The information we are collecting includes ER, PR, and HER2 status of original tumour, whether metastases were biopsied and the results of the biopsy. We are also documenting all treatments administered. Results: The percentage of patients who underwent biopsy of metastases, the likelihood of change in receptor status and the likelihood of change in treatment will be calculated. Approximately half of the charts that met our criteria have been reviewed. Of those 125 patients, 35 had a biopsy specimen analyzed for ER/PR and HER2 status. 6 of these 35 patients had a change in their hormone receptor status, and 3 had a change in their HER2 status. The likelihood of change in treatment recommendations will be determined once all the data have been reviewed. These results will be available for the 2013 ASCO meeting. Conclusions: ER, PR and HER2 status may change from initial diagnosis of breast cancer to metastatic disease. This has important implications for treatment and prognosis, suggesting that biopsy of metastatic sites should be routine.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.600
Threshold uncertainty score0.569

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.417
Teacher spread0.379 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicAdvanced Breast Cancer TherapiesFrench-language works237,207