MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W301209603

Chekhov: Poetics, Hermeneutics, Thematics

2007· article· en· W301209603 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Slavonic Papers · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicRussian Literature and Bakhtin Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoeticsScholarshipComicsLiteratureHermeneuticsDialogical selfPhilosophyArtPoetryEpistemology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

J. Douglas clayton, ed. Chekhov: Poetics, Hermeneutics, Thematics. Ottawa, Canada: The Slavic Research Group at the University of Ottawa, 2006. vii, 319 pp.This volume contains eighteen expanded contributions by scholars from both the West and East, most of which were presented at a Chekhov conference held at the University of Ottawa in 2004. Eleven of the articles focus on Chekhov's prose and the remaining seven address his dramas. Nearly all of the contributions offer new perspectives on a host of interrelated topics in Chekhov scholarship such as (mis)communication, point of view, inter-texteality, the absence of an overt message, the role of the comic (particularly in the dramas) among others.Perhaps the most dominant issue in late 20*-century Chekhov scholarship has been the issue of (mis)communication. This is the main focus of Tiupa's article in which he juxtaposes the failed communication among characters with Chekhov's dialogical engagement of the reader. Tiupa juxtaposes the indeterminateness of Chekhov's texts against the poetics of 19ttl-century Realism to reveal Chekhov's shift to the unknown as an invitation to die reader to ponder the vexing questions of life. Miscommunication is also the main topic of Meerzon's article on Three Sisters in which she points out ways in which the comic of the secondary characters often undermines the foregrounded speech of the main characters. She situates this dialogue of the deaf (p. 219) within Meyerhold's notion of the grotesque and the Formalist notion of defamiliarization. The question of communication is also addressed by clayton in his discussion of Steppe. He contrasts the problematic nature of self-expression through speech with self-expression through gesture, silence, and body language and introduces a wonderful example of Emelian singing without words (p. 44).The absence of an overt message in Chekhov's stories is taken up in interesting ways by several of the contributors. The absence of a social message is raised by Markovich, who attributes die shift from first-person to third-person narration in Ward Six to the influence of the Greek menippea (debates in the underworld) and the ocherk of the Natural School. He argues that Chekhov's return to past genres is a way of reasserting the fictional nature of the text. Sherbin in her analysis of Lady with a Lapdog traces the many ways Chekhov repeatedly takes a middle position and interprets this as an expression of the ambiguity and complexity of life that works against a simplistic understanding. The balancing of positive and negative traits is addressed by Jackson in his discussion of Smallfty. He contrasts Ivan's flaws with his sympathetic side and concludes that even in this early comic story Chekhov already introduces a more serious tone, illustrating how things are but without passing moral judgment.The perspective of die experiencing subject is noted by Sobennikov in his examination of Ward Six. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.966
Threshold uncertainty score0.976

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it