MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3012117300 · doi:10.1117/12.2543047

Large field of view macroscopic Raman line-scanning imaging system for neuro-oncology applications (Conference Presentation)

2020· article· en· W3012117300 on OpenAlexaff
François Daoust, Patrick Orsini, Jacques Bismuth, Marie‐Maude de Denus‐Baillargeon, Israël Veilleux, Alexandre Wetter, Philippe Mckoy, Isabelle Dicaire, Maroun Massabki, Kevin Petrecca, Frédéric Leblond

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicSpectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research
Canadian institutionsMontreal Neurological Institute and HospitalOptech (Canada)Polytechnique MontréalCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPresentation (obstetrics)Medical physicsField (mathematics)Raman spectroscopyComputer scienceMedical imagingMedicineRadiologyArtificial intelligencePhysicsOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present the development and preliminary results of a novel intraoperative line-scanning Raman imaging system, developed for neurosurgery applications. The system records fingerprint Raman spectral images over a large field of view of 1.0cm2 through a handheld imaging probe placed in gentle contact with the interrogated tissue. With a spatial resolution of 250µm2 and an acquisition time on the order of 10s, brain structure margins can be identified within an adequate timeframe for clinical applications. The system was designed using detailed optical simulations and its performance was verified on tissue phantoms and in vivo on animals using our laboratory’s Raman point system as reference.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.383
Teacher spread0.359 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSpectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical ResearchFrench-language works237,207