MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3012130862 · doi:10.18316/mouseion.v0i34.5907

Narrativa patrimonial y dispositivos memoriales en Colonia del Sacramento

2020· article· es· W3012130862 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueMouseion · 2020
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicArchaeology and Cultural Heritage
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNarrativeSpace (punctuation)RepertoireSet (abstract data type)Quarter (Canadian coin)SociologyHumanitiesHistoryArtComputer scienceArchaeologyLiterature

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The heritage repertoire in the historic quarter of Colonia del Sacramento is configured around a set of marks, both discursive as material. These tangible and intangible elements operate as support of story and constitute a collection that articulates a narrative, both patrimonial and touristic. This article will attempt to clarify how these assets can be understood as devices and, in that way, they model the manners which space is perceived and acted upon. For this purpose, the concept is defined by explaining how it applies to ways to activate memory. Once defined, it has identified some elements, both tangible and intangible, that can be considered memorial devices for the study case developing in what sense and how they operate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.874
Threshold uncertainty score0.864

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it