MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Modeling the Flow of Multicomponent Reactive Gas on Unstructured Grids

2020· article· en· W3012151209 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ruslan V. Zhalnin, V. F. Masyagin, Е. Е. Пескова, В. Ф. Тишкин

Bibliographic record

VenueEngineering Technologies and Systems · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicAquatic and Environmental Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMinistry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian FederationRussian Academy of SciencesRussian Foundation for Basic Research
KeywordsFinite volume methodUnstructured gridFlow (mathematics)Computer scienceComputational fluid dynamicsMechanicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction. The article deals with mathematical modeling of the subsonic flow of a multicomponent reactive mixture in a flowing chemical reactor. The numerical algorithm is based on the finite volume method; the calculation is performed on unstructured triangular grids using the Message Passing Interface parallel computing technology. Materials and Methods. To describe the flows under studying, the Navier–Stokes equations are used in the approximation for low Mach numbers. To solve these equations, the finite volume method on unstructured triangular grids is used. The study uses a splitting scheme for physical processes, namely, the chemical kinetics equations responsible for the transformations of substances are first solved, and then the equations describing the conservation laws of momentum and energy for each component of the gas mixture are solved. To find numerical flows through the edges of the grid elements, the Lax–Friedrichs–Rusanov scheme is used. To solve the equations of chemical kinetics, a compact algorithm proposed by the team led by N.N. Kalitkin is used. The METIS library is used to divide the grid into connected subdomains with an approximately equal number of cells. To organize parallel computing, Message Passing Interface technology is used. Results. The article presents a numerical algorithm for studying multicomponent gas flows on unstructured triangular grids taking into account viscosity, diffusion, thermal conductivity, and chemical reactions. As a result of the study, a numerical simulation of the flow of a subsonic multicomponent gas in a flowing chemical reactor was carried out using ethane pyrolysis as an example. Computational, known numerical solutions and experimental data of ethane pyrolysis in a flowing reactor are compared. Discussion and Conclusion. The numerical results on the conversion of the initial gas mixture are in good agreement with the known experimental data. The presented distribution patterns of the main components of the mixture and gas-dynamic parameters correspond to the flow pattern observed experimentally. Further work in this direction involves the modeling of subsonic gas flows on unstructured tetrahedral meshes using algorithms of higher accuracy for a more accurate study of ongoing processes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.162
Teacher spread0.144 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEngineering Technologies and SystemsSame topicAquatic and Environmental StudiesFrench-language works237,207