Changes in plasma bile acid profiles after partial internal biliary diversion in PFIC2 patients
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We ask if plasma bile acid profiles can be used to monitor the effectiveness of partial internal biliary diversion (PIBD) for treating uncontrolled cholestasis in progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis type 2 (PFIC2) patients. METHODS: mutated PFIC2 children before and after PIBD compared to healthy controls and 8 PFIC2 patients. The quantitation of bile acids was performed by reversed-phase ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography/multiple-reaction monitoring-mass spectrometry (UPLC/MRM-MS) with negative ion detection. RESULTS: Before PIBD, all three patients presented with >50-fold higher levels of total plasma bile acids, 2-7 folds higher ratios of taurine: glycine conjugated primary bile acids, and unchanged secondary bile acids levels compared to healthy controls. After PIBD, only one of the three patients (P3) showed relief of cholestasis. The bile acid profiles of the two nonresponding patients showed little change while that of the responding patient showed a 5-fold reduction in total plasma primary bile acids, a reduced taurine: glycine conjugate ratio, and an unexpected 26- and 12-fold increase in secondary bile acids DCA and LCA respectively. One year later, the responder suffered a recurrence of cholestasis, and the bile acid profile shifted back to a more pre-PIBD-like profile. CONCLUSIONS: Plasma bile acid profiles may potentially be useful as sensitive biomarkers for monitoring the clinical course of PIBD patients. Relief of cholestasis after PIBD appears to be associated with significantly increased circulating toxic secondary bile acids and this may limit the utility of PIBD in PFIC2 patients in the long run.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".