MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3012181051 · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2979512

Distributed Operation Health Monitoring for Modular and Reconfigurable Robot With Consideration of Actuation Limitation

2020· article· en· W3012181051 on OpenAlexaff
Fan Zhou, Yuanchun Li, Guangjun Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Access · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRobot Manipulation and Learning
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
FundersJilin Scientific and Technological Development ProgramPeople's Government of Jilin ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsModular designComputer scienceRobotActuatorSelf-reconfiguring modular robotControl engineeringEmbedded systemDistributed computingMobile robotRobot controlEngineeringArtificial intelligenceProgramming language

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A distributed operation health monitoring (OHM) method of modular and reconfigurable robot (MRR) is presented in this paper. The proposed method is shown to be able to monitor the health of each MRR joint module based on the deviation of the actuator output from what is commanded. Driven by the desire of avoiding the need of joint acceleration measurement, a novel health indicator that reflects the operation health of an MRR module is developed by filtering the commanded joint torque generated by the joint controller and comparing it with a filtered torque estimate derived from the dynamic model of MRR. The proposed approach can work effectively for MRR modules in any working mode, including stationary state. The proposed scheme has been evaluated experimentally, and the results demonstrate its efficacy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.104
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE AccessSame topicRobot Manipulation and LearningFrench-language works237,207