Plantarflexion force is amplified with sensory stimulation during ramping submaximal isometric contractions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Stimulating cutaneous nerves, causing tactile sensations, reduces the perceived heaviness of an object, suggesting that either descending commands are facilitated or the perception of effort is reduced when tactile sensation is enhanced. Sensory stimulation can also mitigate decrements in motor output and spinal cord excitability that occur with fatigue. The effects of sensory stimulation applied with coincident timing of voluntary force output, however, are yet to be examined. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine effects of sensory enhancement to nerves innervating opposed skin areas of the foot (top or bottom) on force production during voluntary plantarflexion or dorsiflexion contractions. Stimulation trains were applied for 2 s at either a uniform 150 Hz or a modulated frequency that increased linearly from 50 to 150 Hz and were delivered at the initiation of the contraction. Participants were instructed to perform a ramp contraction [~10% maximal voluntary contraction (MVC)/s] to ~20% MVC and then to hold ~20% MVC for 2 s while receiving real-time visual feedback. Cutaneous reflexes were evoked 75 ms after initiating the hold (75 ms after sensory enhancement ended). Force output was greater for all sensory-enhanced conditions compared with control during plantarflexion; however, force output was not amplified during dorsiflexion. Cutaneous reflexes evoked after sensory enhancement were unaltered. These results indicate that sensory enhancement can amplify plantarflexion but not dorsiflexion, likely as a result of differences in neuroanatomical projections to the flexor and extensor motor pools. Further work is required to elucidate the mechanisms of enhanced force during cutaneous stimulation. NEW & NOTEWORTHY The efficacy of behaviorally timed sensory stimulation to enhance sensations and amplify force output has not been examined. Here we show cutaneous nerve sensory stimulation can amplify plantarflexion force output. This amplification in force occurs irrespective of whether the cutaneous field that is stimulated resides on the surface that is producing the force or the opposing surface. This information may provide insights for the development of technologies to improve performance and/or rehabilitation training.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".