Interculturation, Development, and Cognition: Intercultural Autobiographical Memory – A Cross-Cultural Comparison of Identity and Memory Construction in France and Singapore
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cette recherche vise à établir dans quelle mesure les adolescents québécois présentant des comportements extrêmes de contrôle du poids (CECP) diffèrent de ceux n’en présentant pas, sur les plans de l’indice de masse corporelle (IMC), de l’expérience d’intimidation vécue, du concept de soi et de la performance scolaire. Un questionnaire en ligne a été rempli par 835 élèves âgés de 14 à 18 ans. Ceux qui faisaient état d’un ou de plusieurs CECP avaient un IMC plus élevé et un concept de soi plus faible que ceux qui n’en rapportaient pas. Ils étaient plus susceptibles d’avoir été intimidés par rapport à leur poids. Les filles ayant des CECP présentaient une moindre performance scolaire en mathématiques que celles sans CECP. Les résultats suggèrent qu’il importe d’intervenir rapidement et de manière préventive auprès des adolescents afin d’éviter que leur fonctionnement social, personnel et scolaire se détériore et que les CECP perdurent.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".