MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3012241772 · doi:10.1080/87559129.2020.1740246

Non-thermal Technology and Heating Technology for Fresh Food Cooking in the Central Kitchen Processing: A Review

2020· review· en· W3012241772 on OpenAlexaff
Fengying Chen, Min Zhang, Kai Fan, Arun S. Mujumdar

Bibliographic record

VenueFood Reviews International · 2020
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMicrobial Inactivation Methods
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNational Key Research and Development Program of China
KeywordsFood processingQuality (philosophy)Product (mathematics)Process engineeringFood technologyFood industryConvenience foodFood qualityAutomationEfficient energy useBusinessEnvironmental scienceFood scienceManufacturing engineeringEngineeringChemistryMathematicsMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The central kitchen model has promoted the industrialization of the catering industry. The quality of central kitchen products is related to processing technology. The new non-thermal technology and heating technology not only have advantages over traditional technologies in improving product quality and safety, but also have more precise control over the processing process and a higher degree of automation. Using non-thermal technology conditioning before cooking can change the properties of food ingredients, and improve the quality and safety of cooked food. The new heating technology replaces the traditional heating method to provide thermal energy for food cooking, and has the advantages of shortening cooking time, improving quality attributes, improving processing efficiency and product safety. This article reviews the application and research progress of non-heating and heating technologies in fresh food processing in the central kitchen.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.377
Teacher spread0.323 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFood Reviews InternationalSame topicMicrobial Inactivation MethodsFrench-language works237,207