MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3012282873 · doi:10.26524/jms.2017.45

Tops and gst toes in

2017· article· en· W3012282873 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
S. Mukesh Sankar, Sudhakar Pandurangan

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Management and Science · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Policy and Governance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTOPSCommissionState (computer science)Consumption (sociology)Agricultural economicsProduction (economics)CommerceBusinessEconomicsPolitical scienceFinanceEngineeringArtComputer scienceMacroeconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

India has chosen the Canadian model of dual GST. For the past 70 years, India‘seconomy has been funded by invisible money. Elected representatives, governments, politicalparties, and the election commission completely failed in checking it. The big thing thatpeople have not seen from a data perspective is - the recent launch of the goods and servicestax. A lot of focus has been on the challenges, but actually it is a fantastic data issue. For thefirst time eight million businesses will be digitally recorded in a central tax database.In theGST system, taxes for both Centre and State will be collected at the point of sale. Both willbe charged on the manufacturing cost. Individuals will be benefited by this as prices arelikely to come down and lower prices and more consumption more production, therebyhelpinginthegrowthofthecompanies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.881
Threshold uncertainty score0.399

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0080.004
Scholarly communication0.0090.004
Open science0.0010.007
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1190.014

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Management and ScienceSame topicCanadian Policy and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207