Nuove ideologie, nuove autorità in contesto europeo: i discorsi polemici di Grillo e Dieudonné
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Il lavoro analizza e mette a confronto le strategie comunicative di due comici prestati alla politica: il francese Dieudonné e l'italiano Beppe Grillo.I nuovi canali messi a disposizione dal web hanno consentito ai due personaggi di superare l'ostacolo rappresentato dalla "messa al bando" dai media tradizionali e di diffondere in modo virale discorsi ad alto potenziale polemico, la cui forza impressiva si affida anche alla dimensione iconica e al gesto ad effetto.Si è constatato che l'ethos da polemista, che caratterizza i discorsi di entrambi i leader, tende a sfociare in scelte retoricoargomentative riconducibili al genere del pamphlet.L'articolata retorica discorsiva dei due leader si è dimostrata capace di risvegliare un pathos negativo nei rispettivi seguaci, che, riconoscendo in loro figure dotate di una nuova autorità, tendono ad aderire incondizionatamente a nuove ideologie, di cui, sebbene in contesti socio-culturali diversi, i nuovi media sanno farsi potente veicolo di diffusione.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.012 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".