MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3012308444 · doi:10.6092/2281-6062/6538

Judíos y Sicilia en la trama mediterránea: notas y propuestas

2019· article· en· W3012308444 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Giuseppe Mandalà

Bibliographic record

VenueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical and Linguistic Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMediterranean climateQuarter (Canadian coin)HumanitiesGeographyPoliticsObject (grammar)HistoryEthnologyArchaeologyArtPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Jews and Sicily in the Mediterranean Plot: Notes and Proposals The history of the Jews in medieval Sicily has been the object of numerous studies in the past decades. The present paper does not intend to offer a general overview on Jews and Sicily in the Mediterranean networks, or try out new methodological approaches, but rather provides a new perspective on the cultural history of the Jews in Sicily and surrounding lands. After a short historical-critical introduction, the paper proposes to tackle three case-studies: “Between political and cultural boundaries: Palṭi’el and Šabbetay Donnolo”; “The quarter of the Jews of Palermo and the Kitāb ġarā’ib al-funūn wa-mulaḥ al-‘uyūn”; and “A letter of Labrāṭ b. Mūsà b. Suġmār and the circulation of news in a ‘Mediterranean society’”.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.032

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.006
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.225
GPT teacher head0.573
Teacher spread0.348 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)Same topicHistorical and Linguistic StudiesFrench-language works237,207