An Enhanced Online Temperature Estimation for Lithium-Ion Batteries
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article presents an enhanced internal temperature-estimation method for lithium-ion batteries using a 1-D model and a dual Kalman filter (DKF). The cylindrical battery cell is modeled by a 1-D thermal model with three nodes. This model provides a more accurate representation of the temperature distribution, resulting in more detail of the temperature field. With the newly developed 1-D model, an enhanced temperature-estimation method is developed by including the internal resistance identification and SOC estimation in the temperature-estimation process. Experiments and simulations are conducted to evaluate the robustness and accuracy of the temperature estimation. The estimated temperature using the 1-D model with random initial values is compared with the surface temperature from experiments, which shows excellent robustness against random initial values. High estimation accuracy is demonstrated by the comparison between the estimated temperature field and the simulated temperature field from a high-fidelity 3-D model. Experimental results show that the DKF method provides better stability than the single Kalman filter, and the accuracy of the internal temperature estimation is improved by the equivalent thermal conductivity identification that considers the anisotropy of thermal conductivity in different directions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".