Quarter Life Crisis Pada Mahasiswa Berorganisasi Dan Tidak Berorganisasi
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Quarter life crisis is a period of transition from adolescence to early adulthood (approximately between the age of 18 and 29whichshowssome exaggerated responses such as panicking, having abundant choices andeven feeling adrift. Another comprehensive characteristics of quarter life crisis comprise of identity confusion, career determination, social life, interpersonal relations, independence and marriage. This study aims to discover the differences of quarter life crisis between students who join an organization and those who do not participate any organization. An additional purpose is to alleviate the impact on students who experience a quarter life crisis. This study applied a comparative qualitative approach and involved 185 respondents using quota sampling method (non-probability). The data was collected by the use of Quarter Life Crisis Scale.The result drawn from the study reveal that there are no significant differences between students who participate an organization and students who do not engage any organization, sig. (2-taled) 0,934 > 0,05. It can be concluded aged 18-29 have potential to experience a quarter life crisis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".