MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3012377455 · doi:10.82308/37843

Unsteady airfoil flow control via a dynamically deflected trailing-edge flap

2008· article· en· W3012377455 on OpenAlex
P. Gerontakos

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPlasma and Flow Control in Aerodynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les TechnologiesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMcGill University
KeywordsAirfoilTrailing edgeFlow (mathematics)Flow control (data)Flight control surfacesMarine engineeringComputer scienceAerodynamicsMechanicsEngineeringAerospace engineeringPhysicsTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The control of the flow around a harmonically oscillating NACA 0015 airfoil via a dynamically deflected simply-hinged trailing-edge flap was investigated experimentally at a Reynolds number of 2.46 x 105 by using a combination of techniques, including surface pressure measurements, hot-wire wake velocity surveys and particle image velocimetry flowfield measurements. The tests were conducted under deep-stall conditions, with special attention being focused on identifying the changes in the flow structures that led to the observed modified aerodynamic load characteristics, and on the evaluation of the effects of the prescheduled trapezoidal flap motion profile. In addition, light-stall and attached-flow oscillations were also considered, as were static flap deflections and higher harmonic flap motions. The results indicate that a trailing-edge flap imposed an effective camber in the trailing-edge region, and was highly effective in the control of the aerodynamic loads. This was achieved in large part by the manipulation of the lower flap surface pressure distribution via changes to the windward-side flow stream, and was unaffected by the state of the flow above the airfoil. The leading-edge vortex, the predominant flow structure over the airfoil, was only marginally affected in its strength and initiation. The results also revealed that both the flap angle and deflection rate contributed to the above observations, and that the active motion was crucial in preventing the flow separation observed over the lower flap surface for an equivalent static flap, which would have hindered its performance. Furthermore, control was limited to the duration of the flap motion, and, in general, no effect on the flow or aerodynamic loads was observed while the flap was withdrawn to its initial undeflected position. The detailed parametric study showed the characteristics of the flap motion profile to be highly influential on the degree of control. In the application of an optimum flap motion schedule to dynamic stall, the severe nose-down pitching moment decreased by 40%, the performance ratio improved by 30%, and the aerodynamic damping became positive and increased four-fold; this was, however, accompanied by a 20% reduction in the maximum lift.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.823
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.182
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it