MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3012389036 · doi:10.11575/prism/32945

Catalytic Upgrading of Low Cost Carbon Resources Under Methane Environment

2018· dissertation· en· W3012389036 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Aiguo Wang

Bibliographic record

VenuePRISM (University of Calgary) · 2018
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicCatalysts for Methane Reforming
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMethaneCatalysisCarbon fibersEnvironmental scienceWaste managementChemistryEnvironmental chemistryBusinessEngineeringMaterials scienceOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The heavy reliance on fossil fuels raises concerns about economic stability and environmental impact, making it desirable to find a renewable energy source that is cost competitive with traditional fuels. Catalytic conversion of low cost carbon resources such as biomass into biofuels and valuable chemicals has the potential of alleviating the dependence on fossil fuels. However, due to high oxygen content of biomass, the upgraded products are highly oxygenated and disadvantageous. The presence of oxygenated compounds, such as alcohols, carboxylic acids, phenolics, and furans, results in the products with low energy density, poor quality as well as incompatibility infrastructure. Hydrodeoxygenation is an efficient method to improve the quality of biomass-derived products by oxygen elimination. However, it requires high operating pressure and substantial consumption of expensive and unavailable hydrogen, which makes this process unpractical and economically unfeasible in a large scale. Methane, as the main component in natural gas that is an abundant natural resource present in Canada, is an ideal alternative to hydrogen for the valorization of bio-derived products. Methane (CH4) with the highest H/Ceff ratio could benefit the formation of hydrocarbon products with higher energy density and reduce the coke formation. The activation of methane can provide hydrogen atoms for the deoxygenation of oxygenated chemical compounds, and methyl moieties to form the aromatic hydrocarbons, thus improve the quality and yield of liquid products. Due to the complexity of biomass, several model compounds including ethanol, acetic acid, phenol, furfural, cellulose and lignin representing different functional groups, are selected to investigate the technical feasibility of catalytic co-conversion of bio-based compounds and methane to valuable aromatic hydrocarbons. Mechanistic investigations such as liquid and solid-state 1H, 2H and 13C NMR combined with experimental analyses evidence methane incorporation into aromatic products. Various catalyst characterizations including XRD, TEM, DRIFT, NH3-TPD, XPS, and XAS, are employed to reveal the relationship between the physicochemical properties of the catalyst and its excellent performance. The mechanistic understanding provides valuable insights into the catalytic chemistry of biomass valorization with methane, and the rational design of catalysts for cost-efficient utilizations of biomass and natural gas resources.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.219
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePRISM (University of Calgary)Same topicCatalysts for Methane ReformingFrench-language works237,207