Recommending Curated Content Using Implicit Feedback
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Matrix factorization (MF) which is a Collaborative filtering (CF) based model, is widely used in the recommendation systems (RS). For our experiment, we collected data from a company's internal web site where curated contents are published and pushed to the employees. However, the size of the dataset is small and interaction data is also limited. We got a sparse matrix when we generated a user-item rating matrix. We have used Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP) to calculate the rating scores from the implicit feedbacks. However, on this sparse dataset traditional content only or CF-only RSs do not work well. Here, we propose ahybrid RS that incorporates content similarity scores into an MLP-based MF-model. To integrate the content similarity scores into the MF, we have defined an objective function based on a regularization term. The experimental result shows that our proposed model demonstrates a better result than the traditional MF-based models.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it