FROM THE BARROW «REPYAHOVATAYA GRAVE» TO THE BARROW 407 NEAR THE VILLAGE HUROVKA / ZHURAVKA (CHRONOLOGY)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The article continues the work connected with the construction (restoration) of the chronological system of the Scythian archaic period according to archaeological data. The composition of the accompanying equipment of the barrow «Repyahovataya Grave», which includes items with static dates (mirrors with a side handle, dating no earlier than the second quarter of the 6th century BC — imitation of «Corinthian» forms that appeared in Greece within the specified time), allowed considering it as a chronoindicator for the monuments of the early Scythian period. The erection of the barrow «Repyahovataya Grave» does not go beyond the second quarter — the middle of the 6th century BC, which connects it with the return of Scythian army of King Madia from the campaign to the Near East. The similarity of the accompanying equipment of the «Repyahovatoy Graves» and Kelermes (nine categories) showed that Kelermes also refers to «post-campaign» time and dates not earlier than the last decade of the first quarter of the 6th century BC taking to account the distance of the monuments from each other. The proximity of materials from the tombs of the barrow «Repyahovataya Mogila» and the mound 407 near the village of Zhurovka / Zhuravka is established by the presence of horse equipment, stone dishes, scoops, knives, temple rings and beads. Comparison of the data allows us to date the mound 407 in the village of Zhurovka / Zhuravka within the second quarter of the 6th century BC and assume that these monuments, considering Kelermes too, were abandoned by representatives of the Scythian community, which quickly advanced from the North Caucasus in a western direction at the turn of the first and second quarters of the 6th century BC.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".