MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Quickest Detection of Abnormal Vehicle Movements on Highways

2019· article· en· W3012444015 on OpenAlexaff
Jingyu Wang, Ravindra Kumar Dhanapal, Priyadharshini Ramakrishnan, Balakumar Balasingam

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAutonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceProcess (computing)Track (disk drive)Position (finance)State (computer science)Real-time computingVehicle dynamicsArtificial intelligenceSimulationEngineeringAutomotive engineeringAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The quest to develop self-driving vehicles remain an active research topic. A self-driving vehicle on a highway employs numerous sensors to track the state of its surrounding vehicles. Considering the proximity of surrounding vehicles, it is critical to detect their unusual maneuvers as quickly as possible, especially when autonomous vehicles operate among human-operated traffic. In this paper, we present an approach to quickly detect lane-changing maneuvers of a nearby vehicle. The proposed algorithm is based on the optimal likelihood ratio test, known as Page test. The proposed approach is presented in the form of a novel process model to be employed by autonomous vehicles. In addition to traditional states, such as position and velocity, the proposed process model adds two additional states of a surrounding vehicle being monitored: the lane-index (LIDX) and the lane-change-index (LcIDX). Then we present an approach to keep these two indices up to date in the quickest possible manner through the proposed Page test based algorithm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.061
Threshold uncertainty score0.586

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.177
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAutonomous Vehicle Technology and SafetyFrench-language works237,207