A homozygous DSC2 deletion associated with arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy is caused by uniparental isodisomy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AIMS: We aimed to unravel the genetic, molecular and cellular pathomechanisms of DSC2 truncation variants leading to arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy (ACM). METHODS AND RESULTS: causing a frameshift carried by an ACM patient. Whole exome sequencing and comparative genomic hybridization analysis support a loss of heterozygosity in a large segment of chromosome 18 indicating segmental interstitial uniparental isodisomy (UPD). Ultrastructural analysis of the explanted myocardium from a mutation carrier using transmission electron microscopy revealed a partially widening of the intercalated disc. Using qRT-PCR we demonstrated that DSC2 mRNA expression was substantially decreased in the explanted myocardial tissue of the homozygous carrier compared to controls. Western blot analysis revealed absence of both full-length desmocollin-2 isoforms. Only a weak expression of the truncated form of desmocollin-2 was detectable. Immunohistochemistry showed that the truncated form of desmocollin-2 did not localize at the intercalated discs. In vitro, transfection experiments using induced pluripotent stem cell derived cardiomyocytes and HT-1080 cells demonstrated an obvious absence of the mutant truncated desmocollin-2 at the plasma membrane. Immunoprecipitation in combination with fluorescence measurements and Western blot analyses revealed an abnormal secretion of the truncated desmocollin-2. CONCLUSION: In summary, we unraveled segmental UPD as the likely genetic reason for a small homozygous DSC2 deletion. We conclude that a combination of nonsense mediated mRNA decay and extracellular secretion is involved in DSC2 related ACM.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".