MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3012458673 · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2979222

A New Fusion Estimation Method for Multi-Rate Multi-Sensor Systems With Missing Measurements

2020· article· en· W3012458673 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Access · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicTarget Tracking and Data Fusion in Sensor Networks
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WaterlooUniversity of Windsor
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaNational Science Foundation
KeywordsKalman filterCovariance intersectionSensor fusionComputer scienceWeightingCovariance matrixRate of convergenceFusionCovarianceFusion centerExtended Kalman filterAlgorithmArtificial intelligenceMathematicsStatisticsKey (lock)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new fusion strategy is introduced in this article to estimate state for multi-rate multi-sensor systems with missing measurements. N sensors, which possess various sampling rates, render the measurements. Missing measurements with a certain probability pattern are also investigated. For these types of systems, Multi-rate Kalman filters are designed to estimate a target position at various sampling rates. Next, Ordered Weighted Averaging (OWA) operator is utilized to integrate multi-rate Kalman filters and improve the estimation quality. A new fusion strategy based on a real covariance matrix is introduced for updating the weighting factors, and proof of convergence is granted. Simulation studies on a tracking system verify the superior performance of the proposed fusion strategy in comparison with the Kalman filter, the multi-rate Kalman filters, and also the previous fusion methodology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.384
Threshold uncertainty score0.948

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.213
GPT teacher head0.379
Teacher spread0.166 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it